Wednesday, May 12, 2010

Bonheur


(Henri Matisse, Le Bonheur de Vivre, 1906)

Since coming to France last August, the four of us have learned an entirely new way of living our life as a family. By settling in here, gradually stepping out of the role of tourists and into the unfamiliar rhythms of a new place, we have slowly discovered not only a new language, but also different ways of experiencing all of the elements of everyday life: food, school, friendships, color, light, health, growth, and even our very own family.

At the start of our adventure, I named this blog in a lighthearted burst of cynicism, assuming that I would drag my own little bagful of likes, dislikes, quirks, hopes and disappointments wherever I went. Bill could take us three girls out of Brooklyn, I thought, but we would be defiantly the same wherever we went.

But that hasn’t been the case. It’s different here in more fundamental ways than any of us could have imagined. And therefore, I am different. We are different. Even our happiness is different. (Thanks again to Five for Ten for the thematic inspiration.)

I believe in the setpoint theory of happiness, which is that each of us has a happiness thermostat. As individuals, we tend to hover around the same degree of happiness, despite even radical changes in the circumstances of our lives. As Daniel Goleman put it, writing in The New York Times, in July 1996,

“There is…scientists contend, a set point for happiness, a genetically determined mood level that the vagaries of life may nudge upward or downward, but only for a while. With time, the grouchy tend to become as cranky as before, and the light-hearted cheery again.”

When we came here, I assumed that this would be true – that despite embracing a life centered around my family, away from the stresses of work, and in a totally idyllic location, I would find myself swinging between ebullient and cranky just as I have my whole life.

If you read this blog start to finish (as I am sure only a few members of my own family have done) you would see that that has in fact been the case. My glass is generally half-empty or half-full from day to day, but rarely overflows and never ever runs totally dry.

But the precise quality of the happiness I have found here is different. It feels more steady, somehow. More daily and rhythmic. Fewer amusements rise like soap bubbles, only to burst into the air as disappointments. As an armchair anthropologist, I’ve tried to puzzle through exactly why.

I have to credit the French. It’s not for nothing that people love to come here, as the French have preserved and cherished a landscape and a lifestyle to which the rest of the world likes to escape, on the order of 85 million tourists per year.

The people who have lived in this countryside for basically all of human history appear to me to have a different way of being happy from the way Americans define the word. While the U.S. Constitution reminds us of our right to pursue own own innovative forms of happiness, the French seem dead serious about insuring the preservation of their shared vision of bonheur.

American-style happiness is individually-defined. Mine may look like yours, but it might not. Our happiness is also often fleeting and elusive. It is characterized by enormous smiles, fulfillment in one’s career, good times rolling on the weekend, and a feeling of freedom of expressing one’s emotions and ideas. Americans are often surprised – shocked even -- when the forms of happiness we promised ourselves we'd find are shattered, or turn out to be hollow. But, hopeful as ever, we get up the next day and pursue happiness again. There is always something more amazing on the horizon to consume or achieve. And we're just the ones to invent it.

In contrast, the Bonheur of the French appears to be the sum of a long series of carefully thought-out shared cultural decisions about how to eat, what to drink, when to work, and how to love. It is less about smiles, about individual choices, or the pursuit of the next amazing thing. Instead, it’s much more about a comfortably shared sense of how the moments, seasons, and years of life should unfold.

In its true form à la proveçal, bonheur is maintained in a series of careful steps from one pleasant, comfortable moment to the next. In the morning, the churchbells chime and we all open our shutters in pretty much the same way. We take our coffee and croissant in the café, sitting down and chewing and gazing out languidly into space. The stores open and we all get big straw baskets to collect the day’s worth of whatever is freshest. (Fruits and vegetables here are bred for their taste rather than for their shelf life: they are ripe and perfect one day, and mush the next.)

School and work happen for a few hours in the morning, but then lunch is long, and relatively leisurely. It is taken at a real table, often followed by a nap. (A nap! I’m not kidding!) Here in the South, the stores close for a few hours in the middle of the day, after which everybody learns or works again in the afternoon. Later, there are aperitifs and dinner and salad and cheese and the pulling shutters closed to mark the end of the day.

Bonheur is sustained through the process of these milestones of daily life being reached and savored fully and in turn. A true French person moves deliberately from shutters to coffee to shuteye after lunch, recognizing that this order of life – so carefully developed over generations of habit and cultural agreement – is the cornerstone of his or her share of the joy of life. Happiness is not located in novelty, and it isn’t individual. (That is passion and pleasure – another thing entirely in France.) Rather, happiness is found in a carefully choreographed series of pleasant and predictable tried-and-true experiences.

To an American, this all has a touch of the boring. How could happiness be so predictable? Someone French might answer: this is just how we do things. Fewer promised peaks, perhaps – but also fewer perilous tumbles into the depths.

I would also add that the rigidity and the specificity required to preserve the French way of life hasn't been my favorite aspects of this year: the French may have bonheur, but they aren't exactly likely to be cheerful, friendly and fun about it.

French president Nicholas Sarkozy got a lot of press back in the fall for suggesting that nations measure themselves (and one another) not just on the basis of gross domestic product, but also by the degree of bonheur of their citizens. To the degree that any Americans even paid attention to Sarkozy, they rightly saw this as a shot across our bow – and just as quickly dismissed his serious argument as typically French fol-de-rol.

But he meant something a lot deeper than most Americans would care to seriously entertain – for example, how might the quality of life change for typical Americans if we had the kind of security provided by universal health care and low-cost university education? To put it another way: how many leisurely lunches could we enjoy in our lives if we weren’t struggling to hold onto our health insurance and pay off enormous college loans?

But I digress.

When we were living in Brooklyn, our little family took our happiness where we could find it. Since we were then wholly occupied by the process of being a two-career, two-kid family, running ourselves ragged during the weekdays, we generally took up the pursuit in little bursts of a dance party each evening after dinner, or a Coney Island trip on the weekend, or a vacation with our families. In between to get us through, there would be the fleeting joys of on-line shopping for the grownups, or Poptropica for the kids.

We saw happiness as an escape from the routine, or the routine's successful completion.

Here France, bonheur has been the routine in itself.

Sometimes back home we found the happiness we pursued in our escapes or our achievements, and sometimes we were thwarted. We were reminded to find happiness in the little things, for sure, (and we certainly did.) But we were also routinely encouraged to covet other people’s happiness, and then purchase our own, ideally in supersized quantities, in the form of an ever-improving panoply of amusements, objects, and rarefied experiences. America holds out the promise that there is always a bigger happiness in store. This is especially true in the city of New York.

Don’t get me wrong – I love New York, and precisely 51% of me can’t wait to get back. I love it even when I hate it, and I’m convinced that life there is its own version of perfect. American happiness is unpredictable. It's magical. I stand ready once more to pursue it with vigor to the heights and to the depths.

But maybe, just maybe, when we all return, I'll find a way to infuse the routine of our lives with the balance of bonheur.

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

Family



Our last visitors from America -- Grandma, Grandpa, and
the original family francophile, Aunt Maria.

Monday, May 10, 2010

Bon Courage

I'm not ready to go.

I wasn't ready to come here, and now with two weeks left of our life-altering-sabbatical, I'm not ready to go. Actually being faced with packing our bags has flooded me with regret for all the could- have-beens that never were. And anxiety about whatever lies ahead, in the world I used to know.

(Damn if I could just for once get with the program and just be whereverIam.)

As we were preparing to go on this trip, our friends told us how brave we were being, just stepping off a convenient ledge of our lives into the unknown of a foreign world.

This always struck me as a wholly charitable interpretation. They spoke about our trip to Southern France as though we were off to Zimbabwe to dig wells or something.

From my vantage point, as the one setting out on the trip, I just felt stupid and scared. Stupid to jettison a terrific job and a lovely, settled neighborhoody existence for a place I’d never been and couldn’t adequately describe when people asked about it. A place we had never even visited.

I was scared to leave my life and my friends to face the big fat unknown. France was the least of it. I was also facing stay-at-home motherhood for the very first time, and that truly struck fear into my feeble little heart.

I wonder if people who are actually being courageous ever recognize that quality in themselves. On the few occasions when I have been accused of displaying courage, (as opposed to the more frequent occasions when I have been called a rank coward, if not in so many words) I have never seen myself as others see me. In all of those instances, I felt motivated by mission, or passion, or avarice, or sheer dumb bliss. So when it looked from the outside like I was being courageous, odds were that I saw it differently.

For example, there’s our girls, who have showed more courage this year than you could possibly imagine. Grace, the fifth grader who fought back panic every day for two solid months until we finally relented and discovered the miracle of homeschool. Abigail, our sweet little eight year old girl who has fought French school tooth and nail, but still gone to class every day. I’m quite sure that from their vantage point, their own courage has felt at times like failure and futility.

Now, I’m facing down the return trip (on a cheap flight via Iceland, if that counts as bravery rather than stupidity), and going back feels awfully scary again. Today I started packing to bring our little family back safely to its shores, and suddenly all these feelings I had been so assiduously squirshing down into their awful little holes came surging forward.

Anxiety and regret, mostly. Anxiety for all the change I can not yet foresee, and regret for every change that never got made. For all those verb tenses I never mastered, for all those dishes I never learned to cook. For the friends the girls never made.

We've been here for nine months now -- nine months of discovery, confusion, loneliness, and really terrific cheese. And now we're suddenly about not to be, and I can't help but wonder about what I'll bring back, and what I'll have to leave behind.

Here, away from everything we knew before, I've been able to really dig deep and make a home for our little family. What will happen to that home when we uproot it and drag it back?

Here, I've really been able to pay attention. I have nothing to distract me, nothing to get in the way between me and my girls. What will happen to that focus once we’re back in the land of too much to do?

Here, I’ve been able to fall back in love with my family more deeply and fully than I ever thought I could. What will become of that love as we leave our cocoon of French life – à table, and tout la famille?

So far, I’ve only found my answers on this trip by moving forward. Call it courage, if you'd like. Mostly we've gone forward because that's the only way to go.

But this time around, moving forward takes us back.


(thanks to momalom.com for the thematic inspiration provided by their five for ten challenge. Click over to their site to find many more posts on courage.)

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

Guest Weather






Each time our lucky guests arrive in the land of 300 days of sunshine? Il commence à pleurer. I've started to think of rain as guest weather.

Today, Bill's parents and Aunt Maria got up for their first day of five here in Aups, and it was pouring so hard that even the marché was a bust.

But still, even in all this water, the garden is beautiful: orange, blue, and green.

Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Yellow





Provence, you had me at orange, blue, and green.

And then, as you turn towards summer once again, you bust out all in yellow. Just because you can.

Those huge fields of blooming rapeseed are not only stunning, but practical. When we stopped to take a photo, a million bees were going crazy in the flowers, pollinating and making honey and making the loudest collective buzz I have ever heard. Once the blooms are gone and the plants are fully ripe, the crop is pressed for oil.

So much useful beauty.

Monday, May 3, 2010

The Garden and the Game, Part III: Mimicry and Vertigo


When she came for a visit not long ago, our friend Hillary gave me a great piece of information. I was asking her about the key to being a happy ex-patriot in France, as opposed to a half-hearted one, a mere tourist who loves the landscape and the food -- this great big lovely blooming Garden -- but hates everything (and everyone) else French.

Her answer was swift and sure: to love France, one must enjoy playing the game of France, and be a good sport. I trusted her opinion on this, as she is the most successful ex-pat I have the pleasure to know personally. We were on a long car-ride, without any responsibilities aside from alleviating her daughter Stella’s carsickness, so we had a long time to talk. She told me about game theorist Roger Caillois and his definitions of the different kinds of games people play. After she left, I couldn’t get her idea out of my mind as I thought about our experiences this year, the books I have read, and the people we have met.

Parts One and Two of this little muse discussed the first two categories of Caillois’s games, but in case you’re in a hurry, here’s the gloss. To enjoy the adventures that came your way, you could play against France (and its waiters and weird schedules and odd bureaucracy) because you like the competition. An ex-patriot could also relish the element of chance in the game of France, the element of Alea, reveling in its many oddities and surprising twists and turns.

But there are two other kinds of games in his schema. For example, lots of games depend on mimicry. These are the favorite sorts of games in the Pre-Kindergarten where I used to work, as the children would play by demanding imagination from one another, again and again: “Pretend you’re a baby. Pretend I’m a fireman. Pretend we’re in Alaska and this is my monkey.” Games with a strong element of mimicry require a suspension of disbelief, a willingness on the part of the spectator to allow the player to become something else. To quote the theorist, in a game requiring mimicry “the subject makes believe or makes others believe that he is someone other than himself. He forgets, disguises, or temporarily sheds his personality in order to feign another.”

What better way to play at mimicry than to shed one's own language and take on somebody else's? As one friend pointed out when he came here, "Geez, they have a word for everything, don't they?" But as I have discovered, language is a lot more than putting one word behind another. To be a true ex-pat, you need to take on the facial expressions, the little turns of phrase, the very way of being that the French language encourages. Watching our friend Mary fall effortlessly into French was just like that. As a matter of fact, she even fell into British English when talking to Jessica. Once again, that girl was born to live here.

Julia Child strikes me as the best possible literary example of somebody deeply at play at the game of pretend French. As she describes in her memoir, My Life in France, the whole first part of her life was sort of one long flail, before she discovered the real purpose of her life: mimicking the great French chefs.

Importantly, she was not one of those awful snobs who actually believe they can somehow become French with enough affectations. In her funny asides in her cookbook, as in her television show, she always maintained a sense of humor. Caillois again: “The pleasure lies in being or passing for another. But in games the basic intention is not that of deceiving the spectators. Instead, Child constantly relished the ways in which being here – and puzzling through the game of France – could be fun. (And watching Streep mimic Child mimicking France? Priceless.)

According to Caillois, a central quality of games of mimicry is the requirement that the actor “fascinates” the spectator. However, it seems clear to me that many of the successful ex-patriots I know who are cooking like the French, dressing like the French, decorating or swearing or shrugging like the French, are also hard at work fascinating themselves. If you’re looking for a country to go and play house, this is a great one to choose.

So to enjoy one’s ex-patriot French experience, you can like the competition, the sense of chance, or the fascination of dressing up and using different words for everything.

Or, perhaps, say, if you’re nothing at all like me, you are the sort of person who enjoys games involving Ilinx. This term can be translated literally as “whirlpool,” and refers to any game that induces vertigo. These games turn on the feeling of falling free, on the pleasures of disorientation, on the way one’s mind tends to swirl in the face of being upended. If you’re that sort of good sport, you find your fun in leaping from high places, speeding down hills in cars or on skis, or in being utterly turned around and lost and then suddenly finding yourself righted. All things that leave control-aholics like me white-knuckled, panicked and sobbing, or simply very, very carsick.

I’m with Hillary's girl Stella when it comes to long car trips and windy roads; I almost can’t bear them unless I’m the one driving. But Hillary herself, the woman whose quick answer to my question about expatriots got me puzzling about these different kinds of games, has been happily falling into the abyss that is France for twenty years now.

When we first met her, back in college, she was the school’s champion high diver, literally hurling herself into a whirlpool at high speeds to win games. Her hair then, as now, fell in lush corkscrew curls, as if to advertise how much fun it is for her to twist her way through life.

And ever since she decided to come here, she’s been doing just that. She threw herself into the task of mastering French, then she fell from one challenging, interesting sort of work to another. She has leapt from project to freelance to company to art installation, making her choices fit her circumstances. Right now she’s balancing raising her two tiny children (both absolutely delicious little human beings) with a photography exhibition planned for a public park in Paris and a dance project with a choreographer in Berlin. She has enjoyed the freedom of an artist and the freedom of an entrepreneur, learning to work with photographs and computers in highly complex and sophisticated ways. I know that she has had decidedly dark days – just like the rest of humanity, and sometimes perhaps a worse. Yet because of the way she plays the game, because of her way of being in this weird world, she’s never fallen victim to that lurking fear that things might not work out.

When you like to dive from high heights, spinning all the way down, you have to have a little more faith in the unknown than an ordinary dogpaddler. France has just given her a higher platform from which to execute her more impressive leaps.

Somehow, despite all this leaping, she’s not the least bit flighty. Instead, she’s an awfully grounded and solid person. Over the weekend she and her kids were here, we talked about the ways in which she’s recently tried to become more systematic, more deliberate, more careful in her choices. Having little kids can do that to you, I guess. The more they spin and dive and leap, the more we have to stand firm, becoming the solid ground from which they fly.

But to me, even with two little kids to worry over, Hillary seems utterly fearless. Me? I hoard my own fears as though they are face cards in a poker game. I feed them and keep them alive, despite the greedy way they tear at me. In contrast, she sees a situation where she might be a little out of control, and tries to find ways to make it even more interesting and compelling.

France also seems to make her laugh. She loves everything worth loving here, but she also sees the country’s ridiculous side, and she relishes the opportunities to face down its strange quirks. When she switches into French, her whole affect changes, and she she’s diving headlong into whatever comes next. Living here has become her life’s big adventure – so far. Who knows what spin might come next.

Hillary’s fearlessness reminds me of Bill's. Back in college, Hillary founded the school’s Outing Club, and Bill was one of the first to join her merry outdoorsy band. (Bill and Alain had one of their first brushes with outdoor disaster as a result of this club. When they left to take twenty new members on a pre-freshman multi-day canoing trip, they left school without any tents, and found themselves having to hire a wedding tent to keep all those poor new first-year students dry. He also finished the weekend with a bruise on his face in the exact shape of the gunnel of a Grumman canoe.)

Ilinx, like the great outdoors, is meant to be thrilling and disorienting, rather than safe and secure. Thus these games require a wholehearted willingness to fall wherever you land. As long as I have known Bill, I have been watching him plunge headlong into things. I’ve admired it – either from afar, or from alongside – but have never quite been able to share his joy in the speed and the slide.

Back in college he threw himself into political theory, or theater, or dangerously masochistic sports. Before too long, it was teaching, and travel. Eventually it became love. He has taken me camping during several hurricanes, striding purposefully into the heart of a thunderstorm just for the rush of it all. I used to think he was heedless of danger. Now, thinking about Ilinx , I can see that to him, disorientation and chaos just make things a lot more fun.

This trip has been no exception. While I held back all last spring, clinging tightly to the familiar, despite its difficulties and frustrations, he plunged us forward and onward. I sat immobile in my brown chair, wishing days away, while he packed the house, made arrangements, set events inexorably in motion. He started diving forward, and dragged us all along over the precipice, confident that we would land on our feet. Or, if we didn’t, that he’d find some way to rent us an oversized tent.

Over the summer, he took a Rassias Method intensive French course based on all sorts of vertigo-inducing games. During the 100 hours of instruction, over ten days, he was plunged into French. The Rassias method works on the basis of disorientation. Using theater games and heightened emotion, it seeks to get to the part of our brains that is less guarded and controlled. To Rassias, foreign language is like a game of pick-up basketball. You can’t learn to speak by doing endless drills in a quiet room. You can only learn to play by playing, and the program he has created forces you to do just that. According to Rassias, if you’re still in control, you’re not learning much. We speak foreign languages not to get all the grammar in order, but rather in order to communicate, to love, to play.

Bill’s French was always good, but this injunction – to wade in without fear – has been invaluable to helping him to really relish this year. He has faced down bureaucrats, he has gotten into debates with his French teacher, he has bought and sold a car. (Farewell, sweet Liesel.) He has sought out conversation and connection at every turn. Thus of all of us, Bill has loved this experience the most. This year, I have often sat just off to the side, listening and watching as he spins his stories and dives into situations that leave me frozen. Marveling at him. Proud of him. And so very in love with this magical person, who is so different from me.


Me. Ah yes, by the way, me. Where do I fit into this schema, I keep wondering. What kind of ex-patriot am I? Well, I certainly like all the playing house we’ve been doing this year, although I find I turn to the Joy of Cooking more often than a real French cook would ever deign. Not that I am trying, but nobody would mistake me for a French person, (it’s usually Swedish, or Dutch.) Chance makes me nervous if the stakes are higher than your typical game of Yahtzee, and vertigo’s even worse. As much as I like competition, I haven’t seemed to find many games I could even enter here, much less win. I've been much more of a spectator than ever before in my life.

Instead, I think I’ve seen France this year as a great big puzzle. A French Sudoku, perhaps, boxes numbered un a neuf in impossibly complicated patterns. I've taken pleasure in trying to take things apart to figure out how they fit together, through thinking and wondering and musing. To the extent that I’ve been able to get myself in the game, rather than hanging back in the hammock, it has often been through writing this blog.

As I sit down to write, I step back and puzzle through our time here – the successes and failures, the mysteries and mistakes. In retrospect, in words, and in pictures, I feel like I can enjoy it more – I can find more of the joy of play. So perhaps my joy is in discovering the rules behind the game – or in fact making them up when I can’t discover them. Writing this all down, and making meaning in the process has been one of the things I’ve found most intriguing, engaging, and fun.

But any writer needs a reader, even if I just have to imagine you're still there finding all of this entertaining.

So those of you at home? Thanks for playing along.